{time: MMMM Do YYYY}
CLARITY = Does the essay clearly communicate its main ideas? Is the central question or thesis consistently referenced throughout?
The essay is {formmenu: clear and easy; default=sometimes clear and easy; needs further development to be clearer and easier; name=clarity and ease of reading\ } to follow, but it would help to return to the main question more frequently to keep the focus tight. After discussing examples like {formtext: name=X}, remember to explicitly connect back to how they support your argument about {formtext: name=y}.
COHERENCE = Does the essay follow a logical structure, with ideas building on each other? Are transitions between paragraphs smooth and easy to follow?
The essay flows {formmenu: logically\ ; default=logically for the most part; logically at times , but needs much development; name=logically\ }, but some ideas feel isolated, like when {formtext: name=Z} is introduced. Try to integrate this idea more thoroughly with your other points by showing how it connects to the broader argument.
CRITICAL EXPLORATION = Does the essay critically engage with the topic, rather than just describing or summarizing examples? Is there a focus on "how we know" rather than just "what we know"?
The essay shows {formmenu: strong understanding; default=good understanding; a growing understanding; name=Understanding\ }, but it sometimes becomes too descriptive, like in the discussion of {formtext: name=[example]}. Focus more on the "how"—how subjective interpretations shape the way we view {formtext: name=[topic]}.
USE OF EXAMPLES = Are the examples well-chosen, relevant, and supportive of the argument? Do they help illustrate key points effectively?
Your examples of {formtext: name=Example A} and {formtext: name=Example B} are fitting, but spend more time explaining how they support your argument. For instance, show how {formtext: name=Example A or B\ } demonstrates {formtext: name=\ [key idea]\ }and contributes to your overall claim.
MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES = Does the essay consider different viewpoints, especially in areas where there is debate or contrasting interpretations?
You do a {formmenu: solid; default=good\ ; satisfactory\ ; limited\ ; name=ease\ } job introducing multiple perspectives in the section on{formtext: name=C}, but it would strengthen the essay to explore what these perspectives mean for how we view {formtext: name=[topic]}—are there limits to subjective interpretation, for example?
IMPLICATIONS = Does the essay explore the broader implications of its claims? Are the conclusions insightful and forward-thinking?
The essay touches {formmenu: strongly\ ; default=well; in a limited manner; name=degree\ } on the implications of subjectivity, but it could go further. Consider what your analysis of {formtext: name=D}means for how we judge {formtext: name=E}, or how it reflects broader changes in how knowledge is perceived in society.